You can, however, decide that they are not all the same. Then the task required to judge what disti

The question, paraphrase the famous play, is rhetorical, because we know that "Hamlet" is a tragedy, regardless of the decision of its main character. In one case, we know Fortinbras came to collect the bodies, christina aguilera awards in the latter case probably will not make it, but will still play a tragedy. Parallel election is visible - many are asking exactly how knowing that whatever you decide to do, the play will be a tragedy. And yet ...
Elections are collective in nature - the individual citizen elected representative citizens collectively do. And that - regardless of the electoral system. In this case of collective action both voters and non-voters of - all with their behavior christina aguilera awards decide what will be the composition of the new National Assembly. True, some will say that the National Assembly does not matter that things are not resolved in its plenary hall and its committees, and underhanded, privately. Assume that and decide, therefore, can not vote. Despite this, however, will again participate in collective action and the National Assembly will be elected. Will interjected that before christina aguilera awards in history has there been a case where the boycott of the elections was so massive that they have been declared null and void. And I will add that according to the Constitution, no minimum threshold of participation to be valid elections. It is sufficient to have at least one effective vote in each constituency to be elected christina aguilera awards Parliament (formally even 31 voters can choose it). If you decide not to vote, apparently think leaving others to decide collectively what will happen, but this does not relieve you of responsibility for the collective result of the election. Well, maybe will remain false sense that you are not personally christina aguilera awards involved in collective christina aguilera awards decision.
What happens if you do decide to vote? Here things are not simple, because you have to make a choice. In the case of May 12, 2013 - choice of 45 options. But first, you might ask yourself whether the choice is actually real? Otherwise the question is raised whether behind christina aguilera awards different labels, christina aguilera awards which are presented in the party lists, it has the same views on society and politics, the most important issues to address, etc. If you decide that "all are equal", then you can choose any newsletter. And if you still wonder how to do it, just a draw - this is an old democratic form of selection christina aguilera awards which has been applied in some ancient polis, which suggested that each citizen is competent christina aguilera awards enough. In our case, however, the drawing of lots may result christina aguilera awards in, to vote for a party that hate. So better try anyway.
You can, however, decide that they are not all the same. Then the task required to judge what distinguishes them and what is important to you. You will need to make distinctions - a difficult task analysis, but interesting. Maybe you read platforms or statements of politicians, or recall recent history to convince christina aguilera awards that this or that vdahvz or trust. What can I help in this operation? Just do not think that political elections as a choice of companion (ren) in life or choose a friend for life. Not, never has been and never will be. Political choices made only of representative government. Of them expect to work more or less effectively for the common good, and to comply with a minimum set of ethical rules known to all religious systems: do not steal, do not lie, etc. Nothing more, because politicians are not angels, and we (well is to remind yourself first). christina aguilera awards
So make a choice. However, today things seem not just like any other choice. A series of street protests led to the resignation of the government of Boyko Borisov. The real question in this election is: will confirm whether or not the scale seen in the streets of popular discontent? You will play the role of visiting justice act? We can remember that far and largely elections somehow played the role of judge: they punished the BSP in 1997 the financial crisis punished the UDF in 2001 conducted privatization punished NMS in 2005 " royal estate "(though not as severely) punished" the triple coalition "in 2009 for misuse of European funds. In a sense hitherto christina aguilera awards guilty christina aguilera awards tolerated punishment christina aguilera awards possibly be affected in some way for their behavior (in an optimistic version). The question is whether these elections GERB will also bear responsibility for what he did?
I sense the question really is what the liability of GERD? Without going into standby list, I will say that the most recent scandals involving illegal wiretapping of senior politicians and direct control of the judiciary from the executive, are enough to be held accountable. The problem seems to be that h